| _ |
|
||
|
|
this page:
Phone: |
|
Patent Parts
A
utility patent has three main parts: drawings, a disclosure, and claims.
The drawings and disclosure together comprise a specification. Drawings depict the innovation for which claims
are being made.
A design patent consists of the same three parts,
but simplified, focused on the drawings. The drawings have a
number of views, completely showing the design. The disclosure is
usually merely a listing of the drawings, with a single claim that
refers back to the design portrayed in the drawings.
A
disclosure outlines a problem that has previously defied solution, and
explains the solution. Specifically, a disclosure describes the
drawings. Every major aspect of invention in a patent application is
supposed to be illustrated. The text accompanies the drawings as
explanation.
Oddly, the problem-solution formula
used in the past for writing patents became practically taboo in the
wake of KSR, because it serves as a roadmap for an examiner to piece
together prior art. That kind of hindsight reasoning used to be
impermissible, but not anymore.
A patent claim is a statement of a
novel and useful process, apparatus, machine, or composition of matter. The value of a patent is in its
granted claims. In other words, the claims are the business end of a
patent.
A requisite for a patent is that the
claimed invention has been "reduced to practice." That means someone skilled
in the patented technology would be
able to read a patent specification and know how to replicate the
invention without
"undue experimentation." That, in essence, is what a patent application
is: a nuts-and-bolts guide to implementing a claimed invention. Here's
how we get there.
The patent process begins with input
and interview. You tell us the idea. Preferably you have a write-up, the
more detailed the better. Drawings too.
We rough-draft sample claims. You
review them. Then we go hunting.
Is your idea novel? Really? Let's
find out, otherwise our efforts, and your money, are for naught.
Knowing prior art can inspire further innovation,
extending the scope of possible claims, even leading to further
invention.
Here's why a prior art search is mandatory prior to
filing an application:
1. File claims knowingly over the prior art: not
blind to the prior art, not subject to examiner action regarding prior
art. If you don’t know the prior art, you cannot possibly draft novel
claims, know the appropriate claim scope, or reasonably hope that the
drafted claims are valid.
2. Proactively explain the prior art to the
examiner, so that the examiner grants claims rather than an office
action. Increase the odds that your claims are granted straight-away,
without frivolous action and the expense of a tedious reply to office
action.
3. Knowing the prior art facilitates enforcement
after the patent is granted. Examiners often fail to find the best prior
art. Knowing that the best prior art has likely been overcome during
examination strengthens a patent, and lessens the potential for later
re-examination.
So we perform a patentability search. That
typically costs $600 or less, depending on the technology area.
Drafting a patent application is an
interactive process, getting your input as we progress. We appreciate
you being hands-on in the process.
We often begin with the drawings,
then draft the disclosure around the drawings. It's best to think of a
patent application as an explanation of the drawings, though that's
truer for certain technologies than others.
The claims emerge from the
specification. While we have a sense of the claims throughout the
process, the claims are formally drafted at the conclusion of
application preparation.
After the claims are drafted, and we
are all happy campers on the invention grounds, we file the application.
But before that happens, for complex inventions, we consider claims
strategy.
The USPTO has a serious pendency problem. It can
take five years to get a utility patent. To counteract the problem, the
patent office introduced a a program for accelerating the examination
process: Accelerated Examination (AE). AE has the goal of granting a
patent within a year of filing. But Accelerated Examination is
appropriate only in certain circumstances. AE involves significant
additional prior art search up front, as well as submitting additional
documents detailing patentability over the closest prior art, and citing
specification support for claimed
subject matter. Having extensive prior art search and litigation
experience, Platinum Patents excels in preparing AE applications. We can
advise whether AE is right for you. Claims
Strategy
The best patent applications contain
several inventions. If so, you don't just want to file a patent
application, you want to file the first of a family of patents,
maximizing coverage and windfall potential. So the question becomes,
which invention comes first, and how broadly should the first invention
be claimed.
A common strategy is to file
relatively narrow claims on the first application, then later file a
continuation with broader claims. The logic is that the first patent is
more easily granted. If you then get the same examiner, chances are
improved that he will more readily grant broader claims on the second
round.
If you want a home run first round,
that's another take...
After filing, claims may be
proactively amended, but prosecution really begins with a non-final
office action, the examiner rejecting the claims over prior art, or the
way the claims were drafted.
Waiting for examination has become
interminable, as the patent office has a
serious pendency problem. The entire
process commonly takes three years or more.
Typically, two strikes and you are
out: a first non-final action, where claims may be amended to overcome
the rejection, and a second final action. After a final action, an
applicant either appeals, if the rejection is meritless, or files a
request for continued examination (RCE), to get a couple more bites at
the apple.
The
current political atmosphere in the PTO
is "reject, reject, reject." Examination on the merits is nowadays rough
sledding, but patents are still being granted. The best advantage to
grant is clarity: an easy-to-appreciate specification, and readable
claims readily construed.
That's where Platinum Patents shines.
That, and having inside information on rigging the sails for allowance.
See our
About page for more. After
Issuance
A patent is allowed, and issues.
After that,
Patent Hawk can help you monetize your
patent, to sale or licensing, but most likely, through litigation.
There's another Platinum Patents
advantage. We are a full-service patent consultancy, experienced
cradle-to-grave in patents. Less expensive than law firms, but no less
experienced. |
|
© 2008 Patent Hawk LLC |
|||
![]()